主 办:北 京 中 医 药 大 学
ISSN 1006-2157 CN 11-3574/R

北京中医药大学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 599-602.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2017.07.012

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

《抑郁症中医证候要素辨证量表》的信度和效度研究

于淼1, 李麒豫2, 郭蓉娟2#, 韩爱庆3, 王嘉麟2, 邢佳2, 陈建新3, 卢明4   

  1. 1 北京中医药大学第三附属医院 北京 100029;
    2 北京中医药大学东方医院;
    3 北京中医药大学信息中心;
    4 中国科学院自动化研究所
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-12 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2017-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 郭蓉娟,女,博士,主任医师,博士生导师,主要研究方向:中医脑病、情志病,E-mail: dfguorongjuan@163.com
  • 作者简介:于淼,女,硕士,主治医师
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81573843)

Reliability and validity of Scale for TCM Pattern Element Differentiation of Depression*

YU Miao1, LI Qiyu2, GUO Rongjuan2#, HAN Aiqing3, WANG Jialin2, XING Jia2, CHEN Jianxin3, LU Ming4   

  1. 1 Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China;
    2 Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100078, China;
    3 Information Center, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China;
    4 Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2017-03-12 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2017-07-10
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81573843)

摘要: 目的 评价《抑郁症中医证候要素辨证量表》的信度和效度。方法 收集232例抑郁症患者,采用测量重测信度、分半信度和内部一致性信度来评价信度,利用标准关联效度、结构效度评价效度。结果 各证候要素的重测相关系数在0.612~0.977之间,总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.892,分半信度为0.849, Kappa系数在0.689~0.892之间,因子分析结果8个公因子与预想的结果大体一致,累积贡献率为53.43%。结论 《抑郁症中医证候要素辨证量表》具有较好的信度和效度。

关键词: 抑郁症, 证候要素, 量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To review the reliability and validity of the Scale for TCM Pattern Element Differentiation of Depression. Methods The reliability was detected by using test-retest reliability, split-half reliability and internal consistency reliability, and validity was evaluated by using criterion related validity and construct validity in 232 patients with depression. Results The correlation coefficient of test-retest reliability of each pattern element was between 0.612 and 0.977, Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total scale was 0.892, split-half reliability was 0.849, and Kappa coefficient was between 0.689 and 0.892. The results of factor analysis showed that 8 common factors were roughly consistent with anticipated results, and accumulating contribution rate was 53.43%. Conclusion The Scale for TCM Pattern Element Differentiation of Depression has higher reliability and validity.

Key words: depression, pattern elements, scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R277.7