主 办:北 京 中 医 药 大 学
ISSN 1006-2157 CN 11-3574/R

北京中医药大学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 825-827.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2017.10.006

• 文献研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

宋校《千金要方》增补方剂考证*

李楠1,2,曾凤2#   

  1. 1 中国中医科学院研究生院 北京 100700;
    2 北京中医药大学
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-12 出版日期:2017-10-10 发布日期:2017-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 曾凤,女,教授,研究方向:中医文献与医古文研究,E-mail:2465970771@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李楠,男,博士,主治医师
  • 基金资助:
    *北京中医药文化研究基地项目

Research on supplementary prescription of Qianjin Yaofang of Song Dynasty edition*

LI Nan1,2, ZENG Feng2#   

  1. 1 Graduate School of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700;
    2 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China
  • Received:2017-03-12 Online:2017-10-10 Published:2017-10-10

摘要: 对比宋校《千金要方》与《新雕孙真人千金方》,发现宋人在该书中增补了大量方剂。将这些方剂与宋校《千金翼方》《外台秘要》《金匮要略》等书所载比较,认为宋校《千金要方》增补方剂时很大程度上是从医理通达、学术体系完善角度出发,在推进医学学术体系发展的同时,也不同程度地破坏了《千金要方》的原貌。因此,在充分肯定宋人贡献的同时,应理性评价宋校《千金要方》的学术价值。

关键词: 宋校, 千金要方, 增补方剂

Abstract: By comparing with Qianjin Yaofang of Song Dynasty edition and Xindiao Sunzhenren Qianjin Fang, the paper found that a large number of prescription were supplemented with Qianjin Yaofang of Song Dynasty edition. The supplementary prescription were selected according to the principle of understanding of medical knowledge and improvement of academic system, comparing with Qianjin Yifang, Waitai Miyao, Jingui Yaolue of Song Dynasty edition. The supplementary work pushed development of medical academic system, but destroyed original meaning of Qianjin Yaofang to a certain degree. Therefore, scholar value of Qianjin Yaofang of Song Dynasty edition should evaluated rationally based on confirmed contribution of Song scholars at the same time.

Key words: Song Dynasty edition, Qianjin Yaofang, supplementary prescription

中图分类号: 

  • R289.3